Bug classification in software testing

This paper, " Bug taxonomies: Use them to generate better tests " provides a great overview of taxonomies, discusses how you can use them to brainstorm better test ideas, and provides useful practical tips on how to use existing bug taxonomies or how to go about creating a bug taxonomy. The example used is the development of an ecommerce bug taxonomy.

There are also other papers available from the Centre for Software Testing Education and Research , but I don't see anything particularly recent on that page. However it is a great source for useful papers and references to other literature! I've found it useful to consider the types of bug that are most common, in different projects and groups I've worked in - this helps me to target early tests in areas where I expect to find more issues, but I've never had time to compile a serious bug taxonomy.

If that sounds interesting, you might find this blog by Adam Knight on compiling context-specific heuristic cheatsheets interesting. Like the list of 'tags' on the various SO sites. The best classification is the priority of the issues. Severity is also interesting, but can confuse a developer in what they need to do next. Avoid the temptation to add new fields to the bug database. Every month or so, somebody will come up with a great idea for a new field to put in the database. It's very important not to give in to these ideas.

If you do, your new bug entry screen will end up with a thousand fields that you need to supply, and nobody will want to input bug reports any more. For the bug database to work, everybody needs to use it, and if entering bugs "formally" is too much work, people will go around the bug database. In my opinion, there is no "best" classification. I'd follow testerab's links and do some more research - the context in which you're working will give you a good idea of what will work best for you and your situation.

For instance, where I work, bugs are classified by a combination of the following: which module of the system in test they occur in; whether they were found by a tester or by a customer; how severe they are. High-severity bugs found by customers in any of the financial modules sales journalization, tax calculations etc or regular operation modules making sales, taking orders and so forth are corrected first.

I don't think there's a way around classification schemes turning into triage schemes - my experience is that this seems to be intrinsic to software testing. Although there are many defects in software testing, high-severity defects are the most detrimental. They can cause catastrophic consequences for the software, the company, and the testers themselves.

This defect can not only result in huge losses for the company but also puts lives at risk if that product is deployed into production before it has been thoroughly tested. Medium-severity defects usually affect one or two parts of a system ending in work disruption. For example, if a bug slows down the performance of the software, this is classified as medium-severity because it will cause bugs in other parts of the program.

Medium-severity defects could be identified and fixed with a few days of work. Low-severity defects only affect minor features with no major impact on the usability or functionality of an application. However, low-severity bugs can have other negative effects, such as presenting the wrong information to the user or causing the software to behave unpredictably. Urgent defects are those that prevent the software from operating at all or that cause the program to crash. They result in the immediate shutdown of the program that is being executed.

They are typically classified as either critical or blocker defects. Functionality defects that may lead to negative repercussions for the business e. High-priority bugs are those where the client is likely to encounter errors using the program. High-priority bugs would be classified as either major or minor defects depending on how often they occur during the use of the software.

High-priority defects have a significant negative effect on customer satisfaction or usability. Medium-priority defects have some serious effects on customer satisfaction or usability but are not as severe as high-priority bugs do. Medium-priority bugs cause individual errors with only one feature of the program, such as a UI issue or function error. They have little to no effect on customer satisfaction or usability. It is important to understand the defect classification in software testing because it will help us to prevent defects from getting through to the customer.

It will also help us determine the root cause of the defect and provide a better response. The purpose of a bug tracking tool is to report errors found in software, websites, and other products.

Tracking these bugs can be a tedious job for developers. A bug reporting form makes the process easier for them by collecting all the information they need to know about the issue quickly and efficiently.

Bug reports are usually submitted to developers via email or chat messages. Unfortunately, this creates a higher probability for bugs to go unnoticed or get buried under messages that are more important. A bug tracking tool allows you to submit your report directly through the website, app, or system that needs fixing. Software testing is an essential part of the software development process.

QA teams are responsible for making sure that the end product is free of bugs and other defects. We help companies establish effective QA processes considering industry specifics. The test process can be divided into seven stages: requirements analysis, design review, coding, unit testing , integration testing, system testing, and beta release.

Proper test environment setup is essential to execute each stage successfully. Test case creation is an important step in the software development process. It consists of designing tests that will be able to find bugs in the software during system or integration testing.

These tests should be created before or at the same time as the requirement specification for a project. Therefore, it is crucial to get input from stakeholders such as developers and testers about what these test cases should consist of. It is also good practice to define these tests before or at the same time as the requirement specification for a project, but it is not crucial that they are created in this order.

Software testing is a process that aims at finding bugs in a program and improving software quality. One of the most important aspects of software testing is deciding how thoroughly to test the product and what kind of defects to focus on. Software testing is an important and necessary activity for ensuring correctness and improving quality in software products. Software testers often use defect tracking tools to keep track of all defects found during testing so that they can find out which ones need more attention.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Forgot Password? This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy.

By closing this banner, scrolling this page, clicking a link or continuing to browse otherwise, you agree to our Privacy Policy.

What is a Bug in Software Testing? Popular Course in this category. Course Price View Course. Free Software Development Course.

Login details for this Free course will be emailed to you. Email ID.